Peer Rating of Team Members:

Each person, please cut out the form below and submit information on each team member, INCLUDING yourself.  Assume everyone starts with a 4, and adjust up or down from there.  Please submit on paper in a sealed envelope.  I will keep these confidential, but will use my best judgement in evaluating them for your score.

1. Your name:_______________________________________________________________________

2. The number of your group:______________

3. The name of each team member (including yourself) and a number according to the following table:

 

6	Excellent	Leaps tall buildings in a single bound	Consistently went above and beyond.  Helped teammates, carried more than a fair share of the load.  Obviously if you award this number to more than one person, we have a problem.  This is not Lake Wobegon where all the children are above average.
5	Very Good	Leaps tall buildings in a bound and a half.	Consistently did what was required and often went above.  Was well-prepared and made good contributions to the team.
4	Good	Leaps mid-height buildings in two bounds or less	Usually well-prepared.  Often made useful contributions.
3	Acceptable	Walks around buildings without walking into their walls	Usually did work that others suggested, but did not have a major contribution to the project.
2	Marginal	Walks into walls but doesn't hurt self or others.	Attended meetings, but conributed little, but nevertheless was not disruptive.
1	Unsatisfactory	Talks about leaping buildings, but doesn't do it.	Overall, had an adverse effect on the group's performance, by delaying, or promising but not delivering.
0	No Show	Who?	Never showed up or did any work toward the project.