Peer Rating of Team Members:

Each person, please submit the information requested below for each
team member, INCLUDING yourself.  Assume everyone starts with a 4, and
adjust up or down from there.  I will keep these confidential, and
will use my best judgement in evaluating them for your score.

Keep it simple.  All you need to do is to cut and paste into an email
2n-1 of the following lines where n is the number of people on your
team, and the extra lines are for spaces between the individual
entries.  Replace the prompts with appropriate names and numbers.  You
are welcome to include a comment if you like, but you need not do so.

* Your name, evaluation score, comment if any

* team member's name, evaluation score, comment if any

* team member's name, evaluation score, comment if any

* team member's name, evaluation score, comment if any

* team member's name, evaluation score, comment if any

* team member's name, evaluation score, comment if any


The evaluation scores are as follows:

6 Excellent - Leaps tall buildings in a single bound:  Consistently went
   above and beyond.  Helped teammates, carried more than a fair share
   of the load.  Obviously if you award this number to more than one
   person, we have a problem.  This is not Lake Wobegon where all the
   children are above average.

5 Very Good - Leaps tall buildings in a bound and a half:
   Consistently did what was required and often went above.  Was
   well-prepared and made good contributions to the team.

4 Good - Leaps mid-height buildings in two bounds or less: Usually
   well-prepared.  Often made useful contributions.

3 Acceptable - Walks around buildings without walking into their walls:
   Usually did work that others suggested, but did not have a major
   contribution to the project.

2 Marginal - Walks into walls but doesn't hurt self or others:
   Attended meetings, but conributed little, but nevertheless was
   not disruptive.

1 Unsatisfactory - Talks about leaping buildings, but doesn't do it:
   Overall, had an adverse effect on the group's performance, by
   delaying, or by promising but not delivering.

0 No Show - Who? Never showed up or did any work toward the project.